Reflecting on Social Cognitive Theory and Marshmallows

Reflecting on Social Cognitive Theory and Marshmallows

This week in lecture we talked about the social cognitive theory, marshmallow test and self-regulation.

Part of the social cognitive theory is the concept of Reciprocal Influence. This is the idea that three aspects all influence each other. These aspects are Socal Influences, Self Influence, and Achievement Outcomes. I strongly agree with this idea due to personal experience when I was in high school. I was having issues with other girls at school and I really didn’t feel as though I belonged at school. This lead to my want to stay home from school which had a large negative impact on my grades in my classes, I even failed a class because I wasn’t in class enough to know enough for the exam. The issues I had in the social aspects of going to school and my achievement outcomes were influenced in a negative way. In feeling very low about the social issues I was having my self-efficacy was pretty much non-existent. Self-efficacy plays a big role in how much the reciprocal influences impact a student. The better a student believes they are able to succeed, the higher the chance of positive outcomes.

The marshmallow test was interesting as well as entertaining because as a child I feel I wouldn’t have been able to sit and wait for as long as some of those kids did. I like how the researchers used marshmallows to test the self-regulation of children. The idea of self-regulation is along the same lines as self-control and self-restraint.

Coming from the experiences I had in my younger school years I feel like I was let down by some teachers in a way because they were not concerned by my absence in class.  How can teachers able to take more of these three types of influences like social, self, and achievement influences into account when observing their students and their behaviour in the classroom?

Featured Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash.

Jessica Wiedemann

Jessica is a student at University of Regina. Her passion for helping others and advocacy for the prevention of bullying in schools has lead her to a career in education. She is a dog lover, photographer, and a food lover.

Make sure to comment below and follow her on social media, she loves to reach out and connect with you!

Cognitive Development

Cognitive Development

3… 2… 1… GO!

In chapter 2 of our textbook, Educational Psychology by Woolfolk, Winne and Perry, the main focus is cognitive development and two theories by two psychologists, Piaget and Vygotsky, are explained. In reading this chapter I learned three things about cognitive development and the way students learn at different times in their lives. I made two connections in reading this chapter; one to something I had learned before and one to the style of learning I had experienced in elementary school and junior high school.

I learned in Piaget’s theory why adolescents are so self-conscious about what others think and believe everyone is watching. Woolfolk, Winne and Perry explain that in early adolescence between the ages of 14 and 15, there is a constant worry about their peers seeing them make a mistake or wearing the same outfit as last week. This is due to the concept of adolescent egocentrism and imaginary audience. With these concepts in mind, it is easier to understand why a simple mistake or getting an answer wrong in from of their peers in class can have such a deep impact on their self-image and psyche (p.44-45).

The second thing I learned in Vygotsky’s theory that social interactions can be important in learning. Woolfolk, Winne and Perry describe Vygotsky’s theory of the co-construction of knowledge between a teacher and the learner, where a teacher is another individual who has more knowledge on the subject being learned. After the interaction between the teacher and the leaner the learner internalizes the experience and the knowledge gain. This process of learning is more focused on social interactions between individuals rather than Piaget’s concept of stages of development (p. 50).

The last thing I learned was the role of the teacher to be scaffolding for the student. In the last pages of the chapter, Woolfolk, Winne and Perry clarify Vygotsky’s theory of teachers being the “scaffolding” for students’ learning. Learning is not a solitary experience for the child or learner. The teacher is there to hold up the student and give them support in the learning process while the student firms up their learning of a subject. Vygotsky thought the student cannot go through learning by themselves and teachers are there to be a guide when learning (p. 58).

When reading this chapter I was able to relate the content back to an experience I had at a youth camp called EagleU. There was a heavy emphasis on mentorship in this program. To be mentored is to learn from someone else’s experience and draw from their knowledge. This learning relationship is the same as the one described by Woolfolk, Winne and Perry in this chapter, Vygotsky’s “co-construction” of knowledge between two people (p. 50).

Another connection I was able to make while reading this chapter is the concept of putting students into groups so they could collaborate and share knowledge. I remember being put into table groups in elementary school and knowing now that my teachers could have been trying to implement Vygotsky’s methods and learning theories is exciting. Looking back I feel as though I learned better from my classmates in these social situations that were created. I learned the formal curriculum of content for school as well as an informal curriculum of how to interact with others from my peers.

Vygotsky’s and Piaget’s theories have worth in explaining potential learning processes but there is still lots to question in both of their ideas. For example, “could these two theories work together and play off one another to create a combined theory of learning?”

Woolfolk, A. H., Winne, P. H., & Perry N. (2013). Educational Psychology (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Featured Photo by Samuel Zeller on Unsplash.

Jessica Wiedemann

Jessica is a student at University of Regina. Her passion for helping others and advocacy for the prevention of bullying in schools has lead her to a career in education. She is a dog lover, photographer, and a food lover.

Make sure to comment below and follow her on social media, she loves to reach out and connect with you!