Curriculum as Place

Curriculum as Place

The article for this weeks reading, “Learning from Place: A Return to Traditional Mushkegowuk Ways of Knowing”, is a study of the Mushkegowuk ways of knowing and interactions between the youth and elders int he community. Much of this article is trying to facilitate communication between the youth and the elders to find more depth in what the land and their river mean in the Mushkegowuk culture and community.

Reinhabitation and decolonization are motifs that are reoccurring in this work. One example is the reintroducing of youth to traditional ways of knowing. With the interviews the youth had with the elders. The sharing of traditions, values, and ways of knowing gave the youth opportunities to learn and develop a better sense of community with their elders and others.

Another example would be the 10-day river trip the youth and the elders took together. This trip was for renaming and reclaiming the land and to have the youth make connections to the land and the river. This was in the interest of decolonization, to take back their culture and their traditions. The value of the land has a big impact on the traditions and the culture of the community.

The idea that culture and tradition depend on place is interesting when reflecting on my own traditions and family values. I have lived in the same house for my entire life, so for me this house is a big part of the history and traditions of my family. Taking this idea into account there is much of this idea that can be applied to the classroom. Connecting a practice or tradition to a place causes a deeper connection with that practice or tradition.

Being a budding secondary biology teacher there is already a connection to land and place within the subject with learning about environment and animals in their ecosystems, etc. Bringing in the connection to place could be making connections to student’s homes and places they love to go. The interest would be to preserve those places by caring about the environment or preserving nature and valuing the natural state of the environment.

Bringing in a connection to land into the classroom could increase the student’s connection to their own places, but how does a teacher foster the deepening of those connections to place or tradition in the classroom?


References

Restoule, J. P., Gruner, S., & Metatawabin, E. (2013). Learning from Place: A Return to Traditional Mushkegowuk Ways of Knowing. Canadian Journal of Education36(2), 68-86.

Featured Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash.

Jessica Wiedemann

Jessica is a student at University of Regina. Her passion for helping others and advocacy for the prevention of bullying in schools has lead her to a career in education. She is a dog lover, photographer, and a food lover.

Make sure to comment below and follow her on social media, she loves to reach out and connect with you!

Hidden Curriculum and its Impact on Schools Today

Hidden Curriculum and its Impact on Schools Today

The content in classrooms taught by the teacher is from the formal curriculum. This curriculum is written down in a formal and attractive document made by the provincial or federal government. Outside of this curriculum, there is much else that is learned within the classroom. The proper way to act, how to socialize, and things like dress code and organization are part of the informal curriculum called the hidden curriculum. This can affect the development of students more than the formal curriculum. Many of the rules in schools condition students to act in ways that are consistent with social norms. There are examples of dress codes, emphasis on punctuality, hard work, and following instruction. These types of underlying teachings prepare students for the work world. So, in the interest of creating citizens, workers, and fully formed adults this works quite well, sometimes. On the other hand, if teachers are to help students find who they are and realize their true potential and where they fit in society, how well do these types of structured teachings give students the freedom to explore their options as people?

Structures like those above were not always in the educational system. There is lots of history in the Canadian education system that has influenced the schooling of today. One of the parts of history that are still involved in the educational system today is an underlying idea of the factory model of schooling. This concept is that schools are machines to make young students into a perfect copy of the ideal adult in society. The structured rules and guidelines above shape students into the ideal adult for society. Following instruction and hard work are taught to create students that are good for the working world where there is a hierarchy of workers and with a boss of a company managing the work being done.

As a developing teacher, I am forming my own opinions od how schools should run and how the curriculum should be taught. With the roots of these structures still influencing schools today, will change be able to occur in these structures and will society still be similar to today’s standards for the ideal adult or will it be chaos?

Featured Photo by Hunters Race on Unsplash.

Jessica Wiedemann

Jessica is a student at University of Regina. Her passion for helping others and advocacy for the prevention of bullying in schools has lead her to a career in education. She is a dog lover, photographer, and a food lover.

Make sure to comment below and follow her on social media, she loves to reach out and connect with you!